GSPro vs TGC 2019 Comparison
Graphics and Course Selection
However, TGC 2019 boasts an extensive library of over 150,000 courses, including world-famous and championship venues, dwarfing GSPro’s more modest selection of around 300 courses. The vast course selection in TGC 2019 is continually expanding thanks to its user-generated content feature, allowing players to create and share custom courses.
Pricing and PC Requirements
However, GSPro’s lifetime purchase doesn’t include future updates or add-ons. The software’s hardware requirements also differ significantly:
- TGC 2019: Minimum GTX 1060 GPU, 8GB RAM, and 4GB free space
- GSPro: Minimum GTX 1070 or RX 580 GPU, 16GB RAM, and 10GB free space
These specifications typically translate to a $700-$1000 PC for TGC 2019, while a GSPro-compatible system may cost between $1500-$2000.
Customer Support and Practice Facilities
. The company also regularly updates its software based on community feedback. In contrast, TGC 2019 has not seen updates or bug fixes since its release, despite user requests. For practice facilities, GSPro offers advanced features including swing analysis and detailed shot metrics, allowing golfers to refine their technique. TGC 2019, while still providing practice options, has more limited features in this area. Both software options support various launch monitors, but GSPro’s open API platform allows for broader compatibility, including unofficial support for devices like SkyTrak and Garmin R10.
Game Modes and Recommendations
These modes allow players to compete in virtual tournaments, wager points, and team up with friends. In contrast, GSPro focuses more on realistic simulation and practice features. For golfers prioritizing a variety of game modes and PGA TOUR integration, TGC 2019 may be the preferred choice. However, those seeking the most realistic graphics and physics, along with regular software updates, might find GSPro more appealing. Ultimately, the decision between the two depends on individual preferences for gameplay variety versus simulation accuracy.